The Grapes of Wrath Description Al Joad and the S Argumentative Essay Example For Students

The Grapes of Wrath: Description Al Joad and the S Argumentative Essay ettingThe Grapes of Wrath: Description Al Joad and the SettingAl Joad is a fairly skinny guy of medium built who starts out being acocky, self-conceited character. His only justifiable reason for acting cockyis that his brother, Tom, killed a man and went to jail. Al respects his brotherand thinks of him as a man for having killed another man. The fact of thematter is that Tom was only acting in self defense. After a man came after Tomwith a knife, Tom hit him over the head with a shovel, and killing him in theprocess. Al would receive complements all over town from people who recognizehim and being the brother of a man that was a killer. As soon as Tom Joadcomes home from prison, Al is a changed person. We will write a custom essay on The Grapes of Wrath: Description Al Joad and the S Argumentative specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now He is no longer cocky and healmost resents his brother coming home so soon. As the Joad family is forced toleave their home land and travel to California, Al takes on a greatresponsibility. His job is to drive the family and take complete care of thetruck that they are driving. Al takes his job very seriously and gets upset whenanything happens to the car. Emotionally, I would say Al has become very strongthroughout the novel. He starts out pretty depend on the glory of his brother,but he takes his responsibilities seriously. I see Al as being a crucialcharacter later in the novel. He is the kind of person that needs motivationfrom the start, but once he gets going, he wont stop. Setting DescriptionOklahoma could best be described as one large dustbowl. All rain hasceased to fall. The dry wind wisps through the air and gathers dirt. If youlisten closely enough, it sounds as though there are people moaning wheneverwind is present. The heat is so humid that any source of water is dried up, andthe plants wither away. All of the corn crops are gone as well as all othercrops. The dirt is like sand; it has no moisture or fertilization. It isgrainy and hard as though no water has ever moistened it. Day after day,storm clouds can be seen lingering overhead. You could swear it would rain anyminute, but it never does. The humidity only increases and the fine dustparticles become part of the air; which only makes things worse. Not only is itunbearably hot, but it is terribly difficult to breathe. Life cannot exist insuch unbearable conditions. For this reason, life moves on and leaves behindthe giant dustbowl. English

Identification of Stage on the Hayes and Wheelwright Model Essay Example

Identification of Stage on the Hayes and Wheelwright Model Essay Example Identification of Stage on the Hayes and Wheelwright Model Paper Identification of Stage on the Hayes and Wheelwright Model Paper As the organization for analyses I chose the company I work for. Here is a short description of organization which may be useful for better understanding of outcomes: Airframe is today one of the fastest growing beauty companies selling direct. It is present in 62 countries, of which is the market leader in more than half. It takes the 18th place in the world among cosmetics companies in terms of sales volume. It offers a wide range of high-quality beauty products as well as a unique opportunity to Join sales force and start your own business. Brief facts about Airframe 1. 3 billion Euros in annual sales approximately 3. 3 million Distributors (Consultants) 7 500 employees 950 products annually, more than 30% of products are new. Global RD center with more than 100 scientists 5 own production units in Sweden, Poland, China, Russia and India Listed on the Nasdaq OMG Exchange since March 2004 The scope of the evaluation includes: Prepare fundamental data (description of main traits of the Hayes and Wheelwright model) Collect information necessary for analysis. Recommend tools for analysis. Make a clear conclusion about the stage on the model based on analysis. In the last decade the strategic role of operations has increased, which led to fast improvements in management and methodology. The four-stage model of operations contribution by Hayes and Wheelwright was developing from mid-80-s but has already a classic status in operations management due to its simplicity, visibility. It hypothesizes that companies go through four development stages: Internally Neutral, Externally Neutral, Internally Supportive and Externally Supportive. I found the following diagram of Hayes and Wheelwright (1984) the most pervasive and understandable: This model is a result of historical development with increasing performance levels. Stages are as a ladder that needs to be ascended for success to be achieved. The most successful organizations will be those whose operations reach the pinnacle of stage 4. The pears of stage name/maim trait are the following: Internally Neutral Avoid mistakes, Externally Neutral Benchmark, Internally supportive creative reaction to Dustless strategy, Externally Supportive Foundation of business-success And the short name for the model may be From Indifference to Maturity. Analysis in order evaluate Airframes stage Managers have difficulty in assessing the strategic role played by their operations in an internally consistent and coherent manner (Barnes, D. , Rowboat, F. 2004)) this phrase proved me in my philistine opinion that its difficult to determine a stage where my company is now. Its rather difficult to do as theres a lack of simple instruments to make analysis on this question. Suggested below self- diagnosis instrument for internal use is replica of Porters 5 competitive forces model and has a lot of shortcakes. I also assume the quality of analysis may be exposed to bout due to incoming information based on my personal assessments or on scared benchmark data. But its a good balance between simplicity and expensiveness of external experts/databases use or complex mathematical models. Source of information: My personal reflection as a manager who works in the analyses company. Strategic companys data mission statements, TOP- management announcements and interviews. Managerial data assessment (KIP, presentations. Example appendix 1). Extract of main proofs are in Appendix 2 classified under groups above. Proofs like that are used in Strategic stage survey below as answers for each question.

Prophecy in the Abrahamic faiths Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Prophecy in the Abrahamic faiths - Essay Example In Judaism, male prophets including Hosea, Amos, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and female prophets like Huldah and Miriam are considered the â€Å"mouthpieces† of God, Moses being the greatest of these prophets (Swidler, Duran, and Firestone 2007, p. 39). In Christianity as well, Jesus and the other prophets, including Moses are considered as God’s â€Å"spokespersons† (Swidler, Duran, and Firestone 2007, p. 39). Some others such as those mentioned in early Christian writings are also considered prophets. Islam also believes in the authenticity of the Jewish and Christian prophets, apart from the belief in the prophethood of Muhammad. The similarities among the prophets of the Abrahamic faiths are mostly in terms of their teachings, i.e. they preached monotheism, the oneness of God. They denounced idol worship and belief in false gods. They brought in social order to their nation and worked towards delivering the people from oppression and misery. They served as guides, fore tellers, and warners against sins. The prophets of the Abrahamic faiths also gave the holy scriptures to their people. All these holy books were a result of divine inspiration. All the prophets taught the concept of good and evil, life in the hereafter, heaven and hell, the Day of Judgment, angels, Satan, etc. All the prophets trace back their lineage to Prophet Abraham. 11 Differences between Prophets of the Abrahamic Faiths 11 Jews do not believe in the prophethood of Jesus and Muhammad (Honda, Alderman and Korneliussen n.d). In Christianity, Moses is believed to be a prophet, yet Muhammad is not considered to be a prophet. In Islam, however, both Moses and Jesus are revered as prophets. However, one difference in the Muslim and the Christian belief is that while the Christians believe Jesus to be more than a prophet, the Muslims view him only as a prophet. They do not believe him to be the son of God, unlike the Christians. Moreover, while Christians associate divinity with Jesus , Muslims believe that he was able to perform miracles only by the will and permission of God. Furthermore, unlike the Christian belief, the Muslims do not believe that Jesus was crucified (Honda, Alderman and Korneliussen n.d). As Nasr explains, the Quran does not accept the crucifixion of Jesus, but rather mentions that Jesus was taken to heaven (4:157-58 cited in Phipps 1999). The Muslim belief about Prophet Adam is also different from the Christian and Jewish belief. According to Islam, although Adam was considered to have sinned upon eating the forbidden fruit, humankind is not responsible and the concept of original sin is denounced in Islam (Schirrmacher n.d.). However, according to the biblical version, Adam transgressed the commandment of God by eating the forbidden fruit, and so brought death and sin to the entire human race, the reconciliation of which is possible only through the death of Jesus (Schirrmacher n.d.). 12 The main difference between Jesus and Moses, as per C hristian belief, is the divinity they associate with Jesus (Carmody and Carmody 1996). As per Christian faith, although Moses is a â€Å"great religious hero† and the â€Å"medium of God’s amazing grant of the covenant†, Jesus was more than that (Carmody and Carmody 1996, p. 187). According to them, Jesus sacrificed himself for humankind, â€Å"fashioned a new covenant†